Tweaking the PEFO

PEFO is the government’s acronym for the Petrified Forest National Park. Around the house, we’ve come to like the abbreviation so much, it’s now how we speak of that space in northeastern Arizona.

Of course, I’m not tweaking the park — it’s had plenty of that without my help. I am tweaking the paintings.

My first tweaking task is to add more paint. The magnitude of the original plein air paintings I wanted to tackle and the relatively little time I had to get things down in paint made me paint much too thinly. So now I’m slathering on more good buttery color.

And then, of course, I have to make the painting actually work. Actually, in some cases, that isn’t going to happen. But others are coming along.

This is the second Painted Desert Inn, from the front of the building. The first one I showed was painted from the back of the building, was far more “flat,” and certainly more high-toned. On my computer screen this looks a little more faded than it is on the wall in the studio, but it’s a lot less shrieking than the first one.

Here’s a second version of the primary Visitor’s Center at PEFO — the Richard Neutra designed structure. I sat in the courtyard one warm evening just as the light was declining outside and painted this.  The original structure had a flat roof and elegant, austere stainless steel triangles where the awnings run now. The steel looks wonderful in the old photos, but I think in reality they may have been impractical, as was the flat roof.

The tweaking on this painting, from Tawa Point, has been given much greater sense of space, and the Painted Desert Inn, just above the ridge of green, has been toned way down, to fit into the scene rather than pop out from it.

Finally, this is the painting that the detail was taken from that I showed the other day. This is the Painted Desert, and the mounds across the flat of the plain are quite large and, yes, this red. They are the eroding clay of the Chinle Formation, 225 million years old. That is, the originals of these are. The painting is only a couple of months old. This is one of those scenes that gives a painter fits, but I think I’ve got it now. Or at least, as well as I can, I’ve got it.

Along with the fun of tweaking paintings, the other fun I’ve been having is “setting” these into  that semi-rectangular format that I’ve envisioned. In a few days I’ll show some of the versions of  “formatting” — rather like setting quilt blocks. I’m thinking that I may need two or more sets rather than a single one (and perhaps different sets for different spaces), because putting up 14 of these means some are too high and some too low for comfort. But for now, my studio setting space is good for the fourteen, and it’s fun to see how they play off one another.

The sets are all about context. Context — or history, geography, geology, culture, weather, and human activities — all bunched together, at PEFO. –June

This entry was posted in Art, landscape, oil painting, painting, Petrified Forest National Park and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Tweaking the PEFO

  1. june says:

    Oh, and hey, thanks for the compliments on the reds. They were deliciously fun to paint. And I had to keep working them, which meant I got to play with them over and over. They are rhythmic and feel like that when I’m painting them.


  2. june says:

    Tani, Actually, the last one will be part of the set, probably at the very top of the big set.

    If you are thinking of the next posting (“Decisions”), in that post I was only showing the middle section of the set, not the top or bottom.

    In fact, all these paintings are going to be part of the large set — which then may have to be broken down into a smaller set of sets because nobody is 8 feet tall (or at least nobody I know). But first, I am stubbornly committed to 16 paintings in a vaguely rectangular setting — a multi-tych, if you will. Fear not, you’ll see the whole thing one of these days.


  3. Tani says:

    I like the last one. I tend to like texture and repetition so this fits into my personal preferences nicely. The reds are deliciously rich!

    Just curious . . . why is this one not part of your quilt block groupings?


  4. june says:

    I’m enjoying the contrast between the two different adobe paintings. The first one is at the bottom of the Nov 18 post:

    It’s so different from the second one here that it makes me laugh. And people have wildly differing reactions to each of them. I theoretically like the first better but actually like this one more. And yep — those red mounds look very different on close-up photos:-)


  5. Sheila says:

    I can definitely see the improvement in the Painted Desert mounds. Is that really the one with my towering cliff/boat bow???

    Your adobe looks very flesh-toned, warm and wonderful on my monitor.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s